When choosing ammunition, duck hunters appear to fall into
various camps as they prioritize one shotshell characteristic over another. For some, speed kills; for others, ounces of
shot is the determining factor. The two
will argue round and round, while a third hunter shakes his head knowing shot
size is of paramount importance. But
like the various sects of Christianity, though they may seem quite
different—may even start a major European war—in the end, they’re all trying to
achieve the same thing. In the
waterfowlers case, that end is the perfect shotshell; that is, one that blends
the variables of pattern density, penetration, recoil, and cost just so to
achieve maximum effectiveness under various hunting conditions. Like many other truth seekers, I have shifted
from camp to camp on my waterfowling spirit journey, trying out light and fast,
heavy and slow, and things in between. I
feel I’m a lot closer to the goal now and have learned a lot about shotshells
and myself along the way.
Some of the lessons have come quickly, others have required
more knocks on the head. The hardest
learned of these is that #4 steel sucks.
Unless your goal is to cripple birds and frustrate yourself, it is
worthless. I know other duck hunters
will bitterly deny this fact, but like a good Catholic on the field of Lützen,
I’ll grip my matchlock and face the oncoming Lutheran horde.
My first volley is the numbers. The great advantage of #4 shot is its high
pellet count per ounce (~190), however, that’s only possible due to its small
size (.13” and ~2.3 grains). This
diminutive stature is also the cause of its great disadvantage, viz. its substandard
penetration on ducks past about 30 yards (at 1500 fps muzzle velocity). Even at 1700 fps, you only get to about 35
yards. Sure, you may get a lucky hit in
the eyeball beyond that range, but not consistently.
All well and good, but field experience is king, and it
often gives the lie to predictions.
Well, I have tried to make #4’s work over and over--never with
YouTube-able results.
My first go around was a box of Remington Hypersonic 3” 12
gauge 1.25 oz at 1700 fps. Seasoned
shooters will start chuckling at this point... which will give way to outright
laughter when I say the only gun I owned at that point was an 870. The guy I was hunting with laughed too when
he saw my right middle finger after a few rounds and suggested (unhelpfully) I
learn how to hold my gun. The first shot
I took knocked me on my butt (not literally--the literal hip-booted butt in the
water had happened earlier that morning as we set decoys). A flight of wigeon came in perfectly, I fired
and the gun cycled and jammed itself, slammed the trigger guard into my finger,
and left me a little confused about what was going on. Oh, and I missed. I tried a few more, but the recoil and cold,
wet fundament ended my hunt early. I
should have just shelved the rest of the box, but being cheap, I used them in
ones and twos over the course of the season mixed in with “normal” loads of
#3’s. I did end up bagging some birds with
them; all were cripples except a mallard hen that flushed at maybe 15 yards as
I walk the edge of a farm pond. The
impact broke her back. The last shell
took down a fast, passing drake mallard at a solid 40 yards—it was a
surprisingly good shot—but didn’t kill him.
He had a lot of life left, and would have been long gone, but the
pond was frozen just enough to tear the hell out of your shins, and his impact
hole trapped him.
The next year I chased the siren call all handloaders fall
for at least once: duplexing steel shot.
Most seem to cross sizes two places apart (viz. #2x#4, #1x#3, etc.), but
I, being clever, used sizes FOUR places apart, one ounce of #B under a quarter
ounce of #4! I thought it’d be awesome…
but it wasn’t. That same season, I tried
one of the Lightning Steel loads (#19, I think) and an extended IM choke. The patterns were impressive, the field
results not so much. I had half full
boxes of both loads for years till I lost them in a move.
I tried #4’s in the 16 gauge for a bit. Generally, the hunt would start with me
letting loose with between three and seven shells before frustration drove me
to switched to the handful of Hevi Shot #6’s I was hording, at which point I would
cleanly kill a passing duck (it never was a decoying one for whatever reason). One time, I shot a hen shoveler over a
flooded field with #4’s. She landed in a
shallow spot—3 inches maybe—off to my right. Thinking her dead, I ambled over with my gun
at the trail and bent down to pick her up.
She flushed just as I was about to grab her, and my luchador reflexes
snapped the gun to my shoulder and fired off a shell before I had time to
think. Which was a bummer, because if I
had been thinking, I’d have let her get a bit further out before shooting. As it was, my baseball sized pattern blew her
ass off. Literally. As I picked her up by the neck, her entrails
sort of oozed out past her remaining leg and a few token tail feathers hanging
at odd angles. This was on a fairly
heavily managed bit of public land, and I didn’t want to risk a fine for just
leaving her there (my first impulse).
Fortunately, I had a plastic shopping bag for picking up trash, so I was
able to fulfill the letter of the law and throw her away at home. I will say, it made for an easy
evisceration. Also, that was also some
more damn fine shooting!
After that, I moved on to shot sizes that actually work and
had great success (for me anyway) with #3’s, #2’s, and #1’s for several seasons. And there it should have ended. But just like a former smoker starts jonesing
when he gets a whiff outside a bar, I’d see a spent #4 hull floating around and
start second guessing my experience. Maybe
the problem was ME… bad shot choices, poor gun mount, laughable range
estimation… And as a dog returns to his vomit, so a fool returns to his
#4’s.
This time, I’d do it right.
Meaning, I’d pick one load and stick with it throughout the entire
season, then I’d have enough data to make a more studied decision. I loaded up a couple boxes of my standard 12
gauge load, patterned it, and went hunting.
First hunt, I sailed a mallard while making breakfast burritos.* And he really sailed—easily a half mile. Unfortunately, that was the opportunity of
the day. Second hunt, crippled a wigeon. Third hunt, after yet another cripple, I
switched to #1’s and crushed two ducks and a Steller’s jay.
One case of backsliding is enough for me. Now I can say with John Henry Newman, “Firmly
I believe and truly” that the only responsible use for #4 steel shot is chronographing
new loads.
* I was making the burritos, not the duck; he was just
flying around.
No comments:
Post a Comment